SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 168

N.N.GOSWAMY
RANJAN GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
A. F. FERGUSON AND COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Virmani, D.S.Narula, H.K.DUTT, Indra Sawhney, M.L.VARMA, R.K.Anand

N. N. Goswamy

( 1 ) THIS revision petition by the owner-landlord is directed against the order dated 9. 2. 1989 passed by the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi, whereby his petition under Section 14 (l) (e) read with Section 25b of the Delhi Rent Control Act was dismissed.

( 2 ) THOUGH the petition has not been formally admitted but I have looked into the entire record and I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length at the admission stage itself. The petitioner is the owner landlord of premises No. 56-B; Friends Colony, New Delhi. First floor of the premises was let out to the respondent company. Originally the petition was filed on the ground that the ground floor of the premises which was in occupation of the petitioner was occupied by his mother and his sister and her daughter. It was alleged that the sister had been deserted by her husband and therefore was dependants on the petitioner for residence. It was pleaded that the petitioner was enjoying a very high status and in addition to his business at Ludhiana lie was having a business at Delhi and wanted to shift to Delhi. It was further pleaded that he being of a very high status could not live on the ground floo







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top