SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 236

MAHINDER NARAIN
AVIS INTERNATIOINAL LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
AVI FOOTWEAR INDUSTRIES ANDANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dipak Kumar, HEMANT SINGH, K.R.Gupta

Mahinder Narain, J.

( 1 ) BY this order I intend to deal with two interim applications bearing 1. A. No. 88 of 1990 and I. A. No. 2266 of 1990. which have been filed in Suit No. 18 of 1990.

( 2 ) I. A. No. 88 of 1990 is an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, whereby the plaintiffs seek to obtain an order of injunction restraining the defendants, their servants, agents, stockists, dealers and all other persons from using the trade mark AEVIS in respect of shoes or any other trade mark which is confusing or deceptively similar to the registered trade mark A. VIS of the plaintiffs. bearing registration No. 352018 (in class 25 ). The plaintiffs state that they have got the said mark AVIS registered in respect of readymade garments, wearing apparels including jeans, jackets, shirts blouses, socks, hosiery, brassers and footwear, and that the mark is registered on 1-8-1979.

( 3 ) THE other application bearing I. A. No. 2266 of 1990, which I am going to deal with, is an application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure for vacating the order of injunction granted by this Court (A. B. Saharya, J.) on 10-1-1990. whereby this Court h























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top