SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 306

S.B.WAD, USHA MEHRA
AMARJIT KAUR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN JAITLEY, D.N.Sawhney, M.C.BHANDARE, MANINDER SINGH, Y.R.JAIN

S. B. Wad

( 1 ) THE petitioner was appointed as Chairperson of the Central Social Welfare Board (which is a Government Company) for a period of three years, with effect from 20. 11. 88, through a Government Resolution dated 16. 12. 88. The Resolution stated that the petitioner had assumed charge of the Office of the Chairperson on, the afternoon of 28th November, 1988. Alleging that the respondents want to terminate her appointment before the completion of three years, the present writ petition has been filed. It is prayed that the respondents be restrained from terminating her appointment before the period of three years is complete and to allow her to continue as the Chairperson.

( 2 ) IT is stated in the petition that the petitioner is a prominent social worker and a former Congress-1 member of Rajya Sabha from 1976 to 1988. It is alleged that the proposed action of termination, by the Government which has come to power in 1989, is arbitrary, illegal and vindictive. It is also stated in the petition that her services cannot be terminated merely because the party in power in the Central Government is changed. The petition further states that the proposed action against the petitio

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top