SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 878

R. S. PATHAK, M. N. VENKATACHALIAH
M. K. Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Gurgaon Gramin Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
C.P.Mittal, K.N.BHATT, MADHU MULCHANDANI, MIRA AGRAWAL, R.C.MISHRA, V.K.VARMA, Y.S.Chitale

Judgment

VENKATACHALIAH, J.:- The special leave Petition. directed against the order dt. 1-2-1983 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in C.W.P. 5003 of 1982 and the writ petition invoking Art. 32 of the Constitution, pertain to the same subject-matter and raise the question as to the constitutional validity of Regn. 10(2)(a) of the Gurgaon Gramin Bank (Staff) Services Regulations 1980 (Regulations for short) enabling a termination-simpliciter and consequently, of the validity of the order dt. 17-8-1982 of Gurgaon Gramin Bank (Bank for short) teminating the petitioners services as Branch Manager in exertion of the said Regulation.

2. Petitioner was selected by the Gurgaon Gramin Bank as a Trainee Branch Manager and after training, appointed as Branch Manager on probation at its Mohna Branch with effect from 16-10-1978. The period of probation was one year in the first instance, with power to the Bank to extend the probation for a further period of six months at the end of which the probationer would either be confirmed if he was found suitable or if, otherwise, discharged from service. The 18 months period representing the outermost limit of the permissible period of probation exp






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top