( 1 ) THE petitioner has challenged the order dated 9. 12. 89 passed by Shri P. C. Ranga, Sub Judge 1st Class, Delhi in Suit No. M-17/86. The impugned order had been passed on an application filed under Section 151 Civil Procedure Code. by the petitioner herein which application was dismissed.

( 2 ) SOME relevant dates and facts may be noticed before proceeding further. The respondents herein had filed asuit being Suit No. M. 17/86. This suit had actually been filed on 5. 3. 83. On 1. 2. 84, the suit was dismissed in default. On 3. 2. 84, an application for restoration of the suit was filed in which the petitioner herein had filed hisreply, and issues were framed. The case was fixed for evidence on the issues framed in this application (for restoration ). The next relevant date is 10. 1. 86. On that date the case is supposed to have been adjourned to 12. 3. 86. The case, however, was not put up on 12. 3. 86 but was put up on 14. 3. 86 as has been noticed in paragraph 6 internal page 4 of Annexure- a to the revision petition which is an order dated 25. 4. 89 in the same suit. The respondent s counsel is supposed to have noted down the date as 12. 4. 86 instead of 12. 3.