R.N.PYNE, D.P.WADHWA
RAJESHWAR PRASHAD – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this petition the petitioners, in effect, seek direction to the first respondent Municipal Corporation, of-Delhi (for short the MCD ) to extend, under S. 341 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (for short the Act ), the period of their building plan sanctioned earlier in a certain group housing scheme. The second respondent was at the relevant time Commissioner of the first res- pondent and had refused extension of the period. He has been impleaded as a party as his act of refusal termed as mala fide.
( 2 ) DURING the pendency of this petition, respondents Nos. 3 to 15 were impleaded as partics by order dated 21-9-1981. Respondent No. 3 is the association of respondents Nos. 4 to 15. The petitioners, as owners of the group housing scheme, had earlier sold various buildings, numbering 18, to respondents Nos. 4 to 15 and others, who later formed themselves into an association under the name of the third respondent. We will collectively describe these respondents as the association . These respondents are opposing the grant of any extension of time.
( 3 ) SHORN of unnecesary details, facts may be stated in brief. Standing Committee of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.