P.K.BAHRI
R. K. ANEJA – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
( 2 ) THE petitioner has been registered as Class II Electrical Contractor with respondent 1 since 1969 and in 1972 he was enlisted as Class I Electrical Contractor and according to the petitioner, he had executed various works of respondent 1 to the entire satisfaction of respondent 1. Respondent 1 had invited tenders for the electrification work in the multistoreyed building to be constructed at Bhikaji Camaji Bhawan, R. K. Puram, in September 1984 and the petitioner being found the lowest tenderer Shri N. E. Gandhi, the then Superintending Engineer in charge of the said Circle, had awarded the said contract although Shri S. K. Sinha, respondent No. 4, who was then working as Executive Engineer, was not stated to be interested in awarding the work to the petitioner.
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commr. New Delhi
Erusian Equipment and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of West Bengal
Mathew, J. observed in Indira Gandhi
Purxotoma Ramanata Quenim v. Makan Kalyan Tandel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.