K.S.HEGDE, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
State Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Harinarayan Jaiswal – Respondent
Judgment
HEGDE, J.:- These appeals by certificate raise common questions of law for decision. The questions of law arising for decision can be more conveniently brought out if the material facts are first set out. It is sufficient, if we refer to the facts in Civil Appeal No. 2024 of 1971.
2. The 1st respondent in Civil Appeal No. 2024 of 1971 is carrying on the business of selling country liquor. In pursuance of the order made by the State of Orissa, the Excise Commissioner notified on January 8, 1971 that the exclusive privilege of selling by retail the country liquor in the eight specified shops in the Cuttack District for the period from April 1, 1971 to March 31, 1972 will be sold by auction on February 15,1971 and on the following days. The auction was accordingly held on the notified day. The 1st respondent was the highest bidder for those eight shops. His bids were provisionally accepted by the Collector subject to confirmation by the Government. The Government rejected those bids being of the view that inadequate price had been offered as a result of collusion between the bidders. It ordered the Excise Commissioner to call for tenders in respect of those shops. After the ten
explained : Barium Chemicals Ltd v. Company Law Board
Rahtas Industries Ltd v. S T Agarwull
relied on : Cooverjee B Bharucha v. The Excise Commissioner and the Chief Commissioner, Ajmer
approved and referred to : Union of India v. M/s Bhimsen Walaiti Ram
relied on : Cooverjee B Bharucha v. The Excise Commissioner and the Chief Commissioner, Ajmer
Krishna Kumar Narula v. Jammu and Kashmir State
distinguished : Lata Harichand Sarda v. Mizo District council
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.