SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 160

C.L.CHAUDHRY
VRAJLAL MANILAL AND COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
N. S. BIDI COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.G.BANSAL, K.L.AGARWAL, R.K.AGARWAL, SAVITA KISHORE

C. L. CHAUDHRY, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs have filed a suit for perpetual injunction praying for the following reliefs :

(I) For perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their servants, agents, representatives, dealers ad all other persons on their behalf from manufacturing, selling or otherwise dealing in bidis under the trade mark consisting of numerals 12 or any other trade mark identical and/or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs registered trade marks 22, under the provisions of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. (ii) For perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their servants, agents, dealers, representatives and all other persons on their behalf from infringing/offending or violating the plaintiffs copyrights by printing, publishing reproducing or otherwise dealing in the labels entitled 12 or any other label identical and/or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs label 22; (in) For perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their servants, agents, dealers, representatives and all other persons on their behalf from passing off their bidis as and for those of the plaintiffs or connected with the plaintiffs under the trade mark or lable 12 and/or a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top