SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 431

MAHESH CHANDRA
SYNTHETIC FOAMS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SIMPLEX CONCRETE PILES (INDIA)PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.R.Iyer, V.P.Chaudhary, VINAY BHASIN

MAHESH CHANDRA

( 1 ) BY this order I propose to dispose of I. A. No. 4626 of 1986 filed under Order 39 rules I and 2 and Section 151 Civil Procedure Code by the plaintiff for restraining the defendant No. 4-bank from making any payment under the bank guarantee No. 59/85 in pursuance of the invocation dated 31st July, 1986 by defendant No. 1. The application is opposed on behalf of defendant No. 1. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and after giving my considered thought to the matter before me I have come to the following findings :

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this order are that the plaintiff M/s. Synthetic Foams Ltd. has filed a suit No. 1685 of 1986 for declaration and permanent injunction on the allegations that the plaintiff, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, are manufacturers of Thermal Insulation materials under the brand name of "multipurl"; that defendant No. 2. a Government of India undertaking, in the process of setting up a new project at Panchkula had appointed defendant No. 3, another Government of India undertaking, as consultant for that project and that defendant No. 4 is a banking institution and are bankers of the plaintiff compan















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top