H.L.ANAND
BANWARI LAL RADHE MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB STATE CORPORATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE are six applications (I. A. 4316/82 in Suit No. 1392-A/81, I. A. 3302/81 in Suit No. 1090-A/81, I. A. in Suit No. 1091-A/81, I. A. No. 1093/81, A. I. 3020/31 in Suit No. 852/81 and I. A. 3371/81 in Suit No. 1108/81) under Section 41 read with Schedule 1 of the Arbitration Act. 1940 and Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in six different petitions u/s 20 of the Arbitration Act and raise common questions as to the nature of the obligation of a bank under a bank guarantee or performance guarantee, the legal incidents of such a guarantee and the extent to which a Court may interfere in the payment of the amount which the bank has bound itself to do, during the pendency of a reference of the disputes under the primary agreement to arbitration or of the arbitration proceedings pursuant to it.
( 2 ). The primary contracts, containing the arbitration clause, in cases of 1. Ass. 3302, 3303, 3312, 3020 and 3371 of 1981, were entered into between Uppal Engineering Construction Company Pvt. Ltd , and the Central Warehousing Corporation. The Primary contract in the case of I. A. 4316/81, containing the arbitration clause, was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.