Key Points: - The plaintiff, as neighbor, has a right to seek injunction for unauthorized construction that affects light, air, or enjoyment of his property (!) (!) (!) (!) . - Front and rear setbacks are mandatory requirements under the Building Bye-laws 1983, and leaving setbacks is required to be adhered to, affecting neighbor rights (!) (!) (!) . - The court granted injunction restraining unauthorized construction until final decision, indicating the neighbor's relief is permissible under the applicable bye-laws and statutory framework [p_Final] (!) . - The Building Bye-laws require obtaining permits; alterations and specific repairs have defined limitations, with certain works exempt from permits under Bye-law 6.4, affecting what constitutes unauthorized construction (!) . - The role of municipal authorities is to sanction construction; failure to obtain sanction is contrary to bye-laws and affects neighboring rights; the court may intervene by injunction (!) (!) (!) (!) .

What is the right of a neighbor to seek relief against unauthorized construction contrary to building bye-laws?

What are the mandatory requirements and effect of front and rear setbacks under Building Bye-laws 1983 on neighboring properties?

What is the role of the Municipal Corporation or authority in sanctioning construction and the court’s power under Section 41(j) of the Specific Relief Act to grant injunction?