SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Del) 365

J.D.JAIN
MOHAMMAD ASLAM – Appellant
Versus
DELHI ADMINSTRATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K.Sud, Rajiv Chauhan, S.T.SINGH

J. D. Jain,j.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the impugned notice dated 8th May 1981 issued by Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police (Central), respondent No. 2, herein, to show-cause why the petitioner be not externed from the limits of the Union Territory of Delhi. The said notice purports to have been issued under Section 50 read with Section 47 of the Delhi Police Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ).

( 2 ). The allegations levelled against the petitioner in the said notice are as under:

"that since 24-1-65 you are engaged in the commission of illegal acts and offences against body or property involving force or violence and that your activities or movements in the limits of the Union Territory of Delhi are causing alarm, danger or harm to the person or property. That it has been made to appear to me that you have been continuing your criminal activities and have engaged yourself in the commission of offence against body or property involving force or violence falling under Chapters XVI, XVII or XXII of the Indian Penal Code and the following cases were registered against you.

THAT th













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top