SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Del) 116

CHARANJIT TALWAR, PRAKASH NARAIN, S.S.CHADHA
SARDARI LAL – Appellant
Versus
RAMRAKHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT SINGH, B.J.NAYAR, G.S.Vohra, M.S.Vohra

S. S. CHADHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Sections 2 (b), II and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 has been referred to a Pull Bench for determination of two important question, namely -

(A) Whether the undertaking, if any, given by ? party in Court is the same thing as an undertaking given by a party to the Court, and

(B) Whether as a consequence of the undertaking given on the basis of which the order of the Court , has been made, the incorporation of the terms on. which the matter is disposed of, would convert the terms into an undertaking to the Court.

( 2 ) SHRI Sardari Lal, petitioner is the owner and landlord of House No. 183 and 185 (New), Ward No. VIII, Gali Bandook Wali, inside Ajmeri Gate, Delhi-6. He filed a petition under Section. 19 of the Slum Area (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 seeking permission to institute a suit petition for obtaining an order for the eviction of his tenant Shri Ram Rakha Mal, respondent, from the said premises. The Competent Authority (Slums) in its order dated October 27, 1970 held that the respondent is affluent enough to secure an alternative accommodation without creating a slum and granted the permission sought. The petitioner t



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top