SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Del) 245

M.L.JAIN
RAM SARAN – Appellant
Versus
MISRI LAL MAURIYA – Respondent


M. L. Jain, J.

( 1 ) THIS judgment will dispose of S. A. O. 116/82 and cross-objections CM 2147/82.

( 2 ) THE appellant Ram Saran was the tenant on a monthly rent of Rs. 33. 00 in the disputed shop. He was inducted by Lallu Rain father of Misri Lal respondent. The father gifted the property in favour of the respondent and the appellant began to pay rent to him in June, 1972, but stopped doing so with effect from 1-10-1975. Misri Lal served anotice on Ram Saran on 26-3-1979 of demand for arrears oi rent and termination of tenancy with effect from 30-4-1979, but with no result. He then filed the present eviction application under cl. (a)of Sec. 14 (1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, (the Act ).

( 3 ) THE tenant denied the relationship of landlord and tenant between him and Misri Lal. He said that he was inducted as tenant by Misri Lal s brother Ganga Ram and has been paying rent to Ganga Ram and the applicant never notified to him that he was the owner. Upon receipt of the notice he tendered rent first to Ganga Ran, then to Misri Lal, but both refused to accept. Ultimately, he deposited the same under Sec. 27 of the Act for the period from 1-9-1976 to 30-4-1979. He claimed that









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top