Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J.

( 1 ) APPROXELY 9 out of 10 appeals which come to this court are concerned with disputes about the correct construction of Acts of Parliament. These three appeals are concerned with the correct construction of Section 14 (l) (k) read with sub-section (1 1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 (the Act ). In particular it is concerned with the exact parameter of sub-section (II ).

( 2 ) THE Facts: The appellant landlord has sought ejectment of his three tenants on the ground that the premises were let for residence and that contrary to the conditions of the lease of the land granted to him by the President of India the premises are being used for a commercial purpose. Three separate petitions were filed against the three tenants in 1973. The Additional Controller by order dated 21-1-1978 passed orders of eviction against all three of them under section 14 (l) (k) of the Act. He called upon them to stop the commercial use of the premises within a period of 2 months, if they failed to stop the misuse they were ordered to be evicted. The Additional Controller found as a fact that the premises had been let for residential purpose and that the tenants were using th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document