G.C.JAIN
CITIBANK – Appellant
Versus
JUGGILAL KAMLAOAT JUTE MILLS COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this somewhat unusual suit, under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the plaintiff, Citibank 1. A. , seeks a decree for Rs. 77,10,733. 67, against the defendant Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Co. Ltd. (for short jute Mills ).
( 2 ) J. K. Manufacturers Ltd. (for short Manufacturers Ltd. ) has a cotton textile manufacturing unit in Kanpur. This company was incurring heavy losses. In order to render the said textile unit into an economic, profitable and efficient unit and for the purpose of modernising and/or equipping it with additional plant etc. , Manufacturers Ltd. agreed to grant to jute Mills licence to use the said textile unit on terms and conditions as contained in the licence deed dated Sept. 25, 1971 (Annexure 1 to the plaint ). The licence was granted initially for a period of five years commencing from Oct. 1, 1971 on payment of licence fee of Rs. 50,000. 00 per month or a sum equal to 50% of the net profits earned by Jute Mills in the textile unit in each year whichever was higher. A supplementary agreement was executed between manufacturers Ltd. and jute Mills on Oct. 3, 1973 making some modifications in the original agreement.
(
REFERRED TO : State Bank of Saurashtra v. Chitranjan Rangnath Raja
National Grindlays Bank v. Radio Electronics Corporation P. Ltd.
National and Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. World Science News
Amin Abdul Kedar Murtasa v. Jivraj Otmal
Amrit Lal v. State Bank of Travancore
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Kaluram
Mahabir Prasad Rungta v. Durga Datta
Harihar Prasad Singh v. Deonarain Prasad
Wall Mohammad Chaudhari v. Jamal Uddin Chaudhari
Maine and New Brunswick Electrical Power Co. Ltd. v. Alice M. Hart
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.