SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 136

M.L.JAIN, RAJINDAR SACHAR
RAGHUBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
O.N.Vohra, S.N.Sapra

SACHAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Letters Patent Appeal against the dismissal of the writ petition by the learned single Judge. The petitioners applied for and were given sanction by the Municipal Corporation for construction of a building on 19-11-1966. The building broadly was to consist of Blocks A, B and C. The sanction apparently was given subject to the condition that the structure which was existing would be demolished before the commencement of further construction. Sanction was released on 2-12-1966. There is no dispute that blocks A and C were constructed. Block B however, was not constructed.

( 2 ) IN June, 1969 the appellant applied for extension of time to complete the construction. Section 333 provides for a person applying for sanction by giving notice to the Commissioner. Section 336 provides for giving or refusing to sanction. By Section 337 (3) it is provided that if any person does not commence or execute the work within one year of the date on which the building of work is sanctioned he shall have to give notice under Section 333 for fresh sanction of the building or the work. Section 341 provides that if the building or work is not completed within the period specifie
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top