SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Del) 62

LEELA SETH, S.RANGANATHAN
O. P. MALHOTRA,NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.VARMA, P.N.MISHRA

S. RANGANATHAN

( 1 ) THIS is an income tex reference pertaining to the assessment year 1960-61 corresponding to the evious year ending on March 31, 1960.

( 2 ) FOR the above assessment year Shri O. P. Malhotra, the assessee. filed a return showing an income of Rs. 1,720 (which was below the taxable limit) on March 31, 1965. On March 28, 1966, he filed a revised return declaring an income of Rs. 4,295. The assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer on March 29, 1966 under Section 143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on a total income of Rs. 20,000.

( 3 ) THE Income Tax Officer observed that the assesses had filed a return income under Section 139 (4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on March 30, 1965. The rewised return purportedly filed by the assessee was, according to the Income Tax Officer. an invalid return because Sec. 139 (5) of the 1961 Act enabled the assessee to file a revised return only in cases where a return had been furnished by him under sub section (1) or (2) of Section 139 of the Act, and as the assessee had not filed the return dated March 30, 1965 under either of the above mentioned sub-sections, the return dated March 28, 1966 could not be supported by referenc




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top