SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Del) 114

SULTAN SINGH
PARVIN SARIN – Appellant
Versus
MANBIR SINGH, BALWANT KAUR, RAVINDER SARIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.R.Gupta, P.R.Monga, S.M.GROVER

Sultan Singh, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal under section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter called the Act ) filed by Parvin Sarin, tenant, is directed against the judgment and order dated 4th September, 1980 of the Rent Control Tribunal confirming the judgment and order dated 23rd January, 1979 of the Additional Controller passing an order of eviction against the appellant. Respondents I and 2 filed an eviction petition against the appellant being tenant and Ravinder Sarin, Respondent No. 3 the alleged Subtenant on the grounds mentioned in clauses (a), (b) and (e) of the proviso to sub-Section (1) of Section 14 of the Act. The ground under clause (b) has been negatived by the Additional Controller and the Rent Control Tribunal and is no more in dispute before me. As regards non-payment of rent under clause (a) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Act, it has been held by the Controller and the Tribunal that the valid notice was served, that the tenant neither paid nor tendered arrears of rent within two months from the notice of demand, and that the appellant-tenant had complied with the order under Section 15 (1) of the Act. Under these cirumstances,













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top