SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 100

G.R.LUTHRA
RAGHUNANDAN CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.BATRA, R.K.Nasim

G. R. Luthra

( 1 ) THE present petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short the Code) is for grant of bail to Raghunandan Ghauhan, who according to the prosecution, had alongwith Durbeen Singh committed offences punishable under Sections 302, 380 and 460 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code.

( 2 ) ONE Dharam Singh was residing alongwith his family members at Mehandiratta Engineering Corporation, village Kirakunda, Delhi. He was employed in the said factory. It is alleged by the prosecution that on the night between 13th and 14th November 1979 at about 2 or 2. 30 A. M. when the said Dharam Singh and his family members were asleep the present petitioner and Durbeen Singh, entered the house. The were armed with knife and saria. One of them dragged the wife (Smt. Rani) of Dharam Singh and removed her ornaments. They also took away Rs. 200. 00 in cash. They gave saria blow on the head of each of Dharam Singh and his wife and pushed them into a room which they bolted from outside. They further dragged Ramesh son of Dharam Singh. Ramesh, however, resisted on account of which he was inflicted injuries to which he succumbed later on in the hospital. Case was regis


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top