SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Del) 57

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI, V.D.MISRA
K. C. DASS,N. K. CHATTERJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.MATHUR, K.K.Sud

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI, J.

( 1 ) THESE are three petition for habeas corpus. The point raised in all of them is the same. It is a point of principle. It relates to set off of the period of detention undergone by the accused under s. 428 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

( 2 ) THE three accused in the three writ petitions were convicted of crimes in more cases than one. They were awarded separate sentences at different times. Each of the accused was arrested in one case to begin with and thereafter he was also placed under arrest at different times in other cases. This means that formally he was put under arrest in other cases, though he was already in detention.

( 3 ) TAKE a simple illustration. An accused is arrested in one case on 1-1-1977. He is arrested in another case on 1-1-1978, while the trial of the first case is proceeding. In the first case he is convicted and sentenced on 31-1-1978 to two years imprisonment. Under s. 428 the accused will be entitled to set off his period of detention from 1-1-1977 to 31-1-1978 against the term of imprisonment imposed on him in the first case. This legal position is incontestable.

( 4 ) TO take the illustration further, suppose in the















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top