SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Del) 193

H.L.ANAND
PARMA NAND – Appellant
Versus
KAMLA SETHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BRIJ LAL DHAVAN, H.S.Dhir

H. L. Anand

( 1 ) THIS second appeal under Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act. 1958, hereinafter referred to as "the Act" is directed against an order of the learned Rent Control Tribunal dismissing appeal under Section 38 of the Act against an order of the learned Rent Controller by which the appellant s plea for condonation of delay in payment of court fees was rejected.

( 2 ) THE respondent herein, the landlady, sought eviction of the appellant, the tenant. from the premises in dispute on various grounds and in the course of the reply filed to the application by the appellant, the appellant, while resisting the eviction action on various grounds, set up a plea about the fixation of the standard rent of the premises in dispute. It is not disputed that in view of the fact that the eviction action was not based on default of payment of rent, the plea of the appellant for fixation of standard rent was tantamount in law to an application for fixation of standard rent and, therefore, required a court fees of Rs. 13 leviable on such an application. The appellant, however, did not affix any court fees on the reply presumably under the impression that a plea for fixation of standard








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top