PRITHVI RAJ
KULDIP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KRISHAN KUMAR – Respondent
( 1 ) ON 11th October, 1972, when S. A. O. 192 of 1972 was taken up for arguments, a contention was raised by Shri Gopal Narain Agarwal, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 that the said appeal was barred by limitation. That being so, the learned counsel for the petitioner after obtaining time, filed on applicate (C. M. 1128-J of 1972) under section 38 (2) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (herein to be called the Act) read with Rule 23 of the Rules framed under the Act and section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay in filing the certified copy of the order of the Additional Rent Controller (herein to be called the Controller ).
( 2 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgement dated 11th April, 1972, passed by Shri Gian Chand Jain. Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi. Along with the appeal an application under Order 42, Rule 2 read with section 151, Civil Procedure Code was filed seeking exemption from filing the certified copy of the order dated 30th October, 1969, passed by the Controller, as also from filing certified copy of grounds of appeal taken before the Tribunal. The submission in the said application was that an application for obtaining c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.