SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(SC) 315

A. N. GROVER, M. HIDAYATULLAH
Lala Mata Din – Appellant
Versus
A. Narayanan – Respondent


Judgment

HIDAYATULLAH, C.J.I. : This is an appeal against the judgment, March 20, 1963, of a Division Bench of the Punjab High Court dismissing an appeal and a Revision filed by the present appellant. The appeal arises under the following circumstances. A suit was filed by the appellant in the Court of the Senior Sub-Judge, Delhi for three reliefs in respect of a business in which the respondent was stated to be the manager and also for ejectment of the respondent from the premises in which the business was being carried on. The same valuation was adopted for purposes of court-fee and jurisdiction. The valuation was divided into three parts: Rs. 4,000 were taken as the valuation for rendition of accounts or arrears of rent, Rs. 130 for injunction and Rs. 710 for ejectment - Total Rs. 4,840. During the hearing of the suit and on objection by the defendant, the valuation for ejectment was raised to Rs. 1,800. It appears that the appellant paid the additional court-fee but did not amend the plaint. The suit was decreed in part on May 11, 1961. The appellant obtained a decree for Rs. 600 as arrears of rent for 3/4 portion of the shop and Rs. 463.33P. as damages for 1/4 portion of the sh













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top