SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Del) 94

M.R.A.ANSARI, S.RANGARAJAN
PREM SARUP PURI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.MARVAHA, R.L.MEHTA

S. RANGARAJAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS Order will dispose of Cr. Misc. (SCA) 23 and 24 of 1973 also. All these three Applications have been filed by P. S. Puri under Article 134 (l) (c) of the Constitution of India for a certificate of fitness to appeal to the Supreme Court.

( 2 ) A criminal prosecution is pending against Puri. The concerned Judicial Magistrate framed a charge against him under Section 468 I. P. C. in the matter or obtaining delivery of Passport No. 1-454020 as alleged therein.

( 3 ) AS against the framing of the said charge Puri filed Cr. Revision 224 of 1972 to quash the said charge; the State had filed another Criminal Revision 265 of 1972 urging that the learned Magistrate ought to have framed charges under Sections 420, 467 and 471 1. P. C. also. Subsequently Puri filed Cr. writ 20 of 1972 under Articles 226 (1), 21 and 22 of the Constitution for a writ in the nature of habeas corpus or other appropria writ, directions or orders. By our common order, against which appeals are sought to be filed in the Supreme Court, we allowed the Revision filed by the State and dismissed the Revision as well as the Cr. Writ filed by Puri. The Revision Petitions and the Cr. Writ were pl






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top