SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 346

HARDAYAL HARDY, V.S.DESHPANDE
SANT LAL KASHMIRI LAL,DELHI – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.AGGARWAL, ARUN SHARMA, R.L.AGARWAL, RANDHIR CHAWLA, V.Kumar

HARDAYAL HARDY,c. J. (oral)

( 1 ) THIS judgment will dispose of two references viz. I. T. R. No. 13 of 1968 and I. T. R. No. 21 of 1968 The assessee in either reference is a partnership frm. In Income-tax Reference No. l3 of 1968, the assessee is a firm named Sant Lal Kashmiri Lal which was constituted under an instrument of partnership dated 20th December 1952 with the following partners and their respective spares :- Kaslimiri Lal. . . . .- /1/6 pies lahori Mal. . . . . .-/1. 00 anna kanhiya Lal. . . . . .-/1/6 pies prahlad Rai. . . . . .-/4. 00 annas saraswati Kumar. . . . . .-/4. 00 annas gyani Ram. . . . . .-/4. 00 annas. The firm as constituted was granted registration for the assessment year 1953-54 and thereafter renewal of registration upto and including the assessement year 1961-62. Kashmiri Lal one of the partners, died on 21-10-1961 within the previous year, relevant to the assessment year 1962-63. On 30-11-1962 a return of income for the firm showing the total income during the previous year ended on 8-11-1961, was filed with the,lncome-tax Officer. It was received by the Income-tax Officer or 1-12-1962.

( 2 ) IN Part lll (b) of the return of the income the names of the









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top