SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Del) 84

S.K.KAPUR, S.N.ANDLEY, I.D.DUA
BEGUM AFTAB ZAMANI – Appellant
Versus
LAL CHAND KHANNA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.B.LAL, A.B.SAHARIA, F.C.Bedi, Prakash Narain, S.P.AGARWAL

Inder Dev Dua, J.

( 1 ) THE question which this Full Bench is called upon to decide relates to the amount of court-fee payable on appeal presented by an aggrieved party under section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act (hereafter called the Act) against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this High Court given in the exercise of ordinary original civil jurisdiction conferred by the Act, to a Division Court thereof. Section l0 may now be read:

"10. Powers of Judges.- (1) Where a Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi exercises ordinary Original civil jurisdiction conferred by sub-section (2) of section 5 of that Court, an appeal shall lie from the judgement of the single Judge to a Division Court of that High Court. (2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (l) law in force immediately before the appnted day relating to the powers of the Chief Justice, single Judges and Division Courts of the High Court of Punjab and with respect to all matters ancillary to the exercise of those powers shall, with the necessary modifications, apply in relation to the High Court of Delhi. "

( 2 ) THE distinctive features of this provision is that it provides for an appeal from a judgment and not f





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top