SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Del) 18

HARDAYAL HARDY
VED PARKASH KAPUR – Appellant
Versus
HARISH CHANDER RASTOGI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.R.Khanna, M.L.Mehra

Hardy, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition arises out of an order made by the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi, and confirmed on appeal by the Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi, in an application under section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, filed by Shri Harish Chander against the firm J. N. Mehra and Brothers for their eviction from certain office premises in Mangal Market, Joghian Colony, Delhi on grounds of non-payment of rent, unauthorised subletting and substantial damage to the property. J. N. Mehra and Brothers were sued through Shri J. N Mehra on the allegation that he was the sole proprietor of the firm J. N. Mehra and Brothers and was thus the only tenant of the premises. The tenant did not deposit the arrears of rent in accordance with the order passed under section 15 of the Delhi Rent Control Act. As a result, his defence against ejectment was struck out. The appeal filed by the tenant against the order was also dismissed by the Tribunal. During the pendency of the application for eviction before the Rent Controller, the present petitioner Ved Parkash had filed an application under Order 1 rule 10 C. P. C. read with section 151 C. P. C. alleging that he too was in occ









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top