SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Del) 108

HARDAYAL HARDY, S.K.KAPUR
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
KARNAL DISTILLERY COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.R.Gupta, SITA RAM SHARMA

Hardayal Hardy J.

( 1 ) THIS first appeal by the Union of India (hereinalter to be called the defendant) is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Senior Subordinate Judge Simla whereby the plaintiff's suit for recoveiy of Rs. 25,270. 00 has bven decreed against the defendant with costs,

( 2 ) THE plaintiff, the Karnal Distillery Co. (Private) Ltd, alleged that it had entered into an agreement with the government of Himaohal Pradesh on July 20, 1950 (Ex. P-l) whereby it agreed to supply 12,000 L. P. gallons, with 10% variation of quantity on either side. of country spirits to the Liquor Licensees of Mandi District during the remaining period of the financial year 1950-51, commencing from August I, 1950, at the rates mentioned in the said agreement. According to the agreement the Government had to provide a suitable building to enable the plaintiff to establish a Ware-house at Mandi, on a rent of Rs. 50. 00 per mensern for the period of the contract. The plaintiff was also required to deposit a sum of Rs. 20001-1- as security for the due performance of the various clauses of the agreement.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff established the warehouse and commenced supplies of country

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top