SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(All) 397

H. N. SETH
VIJAY KUMAR KEDIA – Appellant
Versus
CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

H. N. SETH J. - One Babu Lal Kedia died intestate on May 4, 1963. Vijai Kumar Kedia, one of the grandsons of the deceased, filed the necessary estate duty return. The relationship between the accountable person and the deceased would be evident from the following pedigree :

 

Babu Lal

(died on 4-5-1963)

 
    

Kamli Devi

(wife, died in Nov.48)

Jiwan Ram

(son, died in May 1949)

    
 

Vijai Kumar

 

Krishna Kumar(From 1st wife, Smt. Kapuri Devi, died in 1944)

Munni Lal(From 2nd wife

Prakashwati Devi)

Case of the accountable person was that the deceased formed a joint Hindu family with his widowed daughter-in-law, Smt. Prakashwati Devi and his three grandsons, Krishna Kumar, Vijai Kumar and Munni Lal. He had thrown all his property in the common hotchpotch of the family. Thus, the only property that passed on the death of Babu Lal Kedia was his interest in the joint Hindu family property. Total value of such joint Hindu family property was Rs. 4,16,240 out of which the interest of the deceased was only one-half.

The Assistant Controller of Estate Duty, Kanpur, held that according to the Hindu law the deceased could not form a joint Hindu family with his daughter-in-law and the three grandsons.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top