SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 225

S.RAVINDRA BHAT
RAJINDER SINGH NEGI – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Respondent


S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

( 1 ) ISSUE Rule. Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, counsel for the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the MCD) waives notice of rule. The petition was heard for final disposal.

( 2 ) THE writ petitioner joined services of the delhi Development Authoriy (DDA) in 1976. He was selected and appointed to the post of ldc, in March, 1981; later, he was promoted as UDC in 1986. By an order dated 29-7- 1991, the petitioner, along with nine others were transferred to MCD. The Slum and JJ wing of the DDA was transferred, by general order dated 1-9-1992, to the MCD. It is averred that the petitioner qualified in a departmental examination for promotion to the post of Assistant, in DDA, on 21-4-2003; he later requested for his transfer to that organization. Apparently, the MCD accorded approval for the petitioner s regularization to the post of Assistant in 2003.

( 3 ) THE petitioner was arrested on 11-3-2005, for having committed offences under Sections 6 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption act, 1988. By the impugned order dated 14- 3-2005, he was dismissed from the services by the MCD. The impugned order has been questioned as arbitrary, and issued in flagrant violation of pri
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top