SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 976

A.K.SINHA
BHARAT BATTERY MANUFACTURING COMPANY PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ANIL KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS order shall dispose of this petition under Section 11 (6) of the arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator by the petitioner.

( 2 ) THE petitioner contended that in response to an invitation to tender inquiry No. AM-5/rc-14100105/072003/wt/btys/defence/2003-04/75 for supply of battery secondary lead acid, an offer dated 7. 10. 2002 was submitted which was revised by letter dated 8. 4. 2003. On the basis of revised offer dated 8. 4. 2003 a rate contract No. AM-5/rc-14100105/072003/wt BTYS/def/2003- 04/75/bharat/coac/185 dated 5. 5. 2003 for the period 5. 5. 2003 to 16. 3. 2004 was executed between the petitioner and the respondent.

( 3 ) THE rate contract entered with the petitioner contained a price variation clause (Clause No. 12) but the variation factor of the batteries, on account of fluctuation of lead price had not been incorporated. Petitioner asserted that the requests were made to the respondent to incorporate the same. Request was also made to issue amendment towards rate of sales tax. The requests of the petitioner s were, however, complied with almost after one year of letter dated 2. 7. 2004 However, during the pe














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top