SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 882

MAHENDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR – Respondent


SWATANTER KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner are the owners of agricultural land in Khasra No. 1715/1613/558 entirely measuring about 10 bighas 14 biswas in the revenue estate of Village Bahapur, New Delhi to the extent of their respective shares. On 10. 5. 02 the Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the act) for acquiring the land including the said land of the petitioners afore-mentioned. In furtherance to this notification declaration under Section 6 of the Act was issued on 8. 5. 03. Upon following the prescribed procedure, the Land Acquisition Collector made his award under Section 11 of the Act on 1. 5. 05 determining the market value payable to the claimants of the acquired land. Petitioner no. 3 had died and in the revenue records the names of his legal representatives have been mutated, however, the respondent with malafide intentions mentioned the name of the petitioner no. 3 in the revenue records. As the compensation payable to the claimants have been determined, the petitioners made two separate applications one for receiving compensation of the adjudicated amount and the other for enhancement of comp



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top