SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1405

A.K.SIKRI
NARESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pawan Kumar Mittal, Puneet Mittal, R.N.MITTAL, U.L.WATWANI

( 1 ) NOTICE. Mr. Watwani accepts notice on behalf of the respondent State. I have heard the Counsel for the parties. This petition is directed against the order passed by the learned MM issuing non-bailable warrants against the petitioner on 21st August, 2006. This order reads as under:"accused Naresh absent. Issue NB W against accused Naresh and notice to surety on 15. 5. 2007. Copy of charge-sheet supplied to both accused present today. Put up for scrutiny and charge and appearance of accused Naresh. "according to the petitioner, he had reached the Court in time on that date and his case was listed at Sl. No. 5. On the last date of hearing the learned MM was holding the Court in Court Room No. 26 and later on shifted to Court Room No. 21. Under the impression that his case is in Court Room No. 26 the petitioner went to Court room No. 26. However, when his case was not called till 10. 30 a. m. he contacted his Counsel and was informed that the Court is shifted to Court Room No. 21. The petitioner along with his Counsel reached the Court of the learned MM at about 10. 40 a. m. when it was learnt that the matter has been adjourned for 15th May, 2007. However, at that time the petit







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top