MANJU GOEL, J.

( 1 ) THE present writ petition challenges the order of Shri dinesh Dayal, Presiding Officer, Delhi School Tribunal, Delhi dated 6/2/2003 setting aside the termination of respondent No. 3 herein. Respondent No. 3-Ms. Prabha Tyagi approached the Tribunal with an appeal against the order of termination udted 15/10/1997. She alleged in her appeal that she was appointed against a vacancy which was published in The Hindustan Times on 26/6/1994 and was appointed as the Teacher in view of her qualification of M. A. /b. Ed. but that no appointment letter was actually issued to her and that subsequently in July, 1997 she was made to fill up a fresh application form and thereafter in October, 1997 she was served with the order of removal. No action as contemplated in the Delhi school Education Act and Delhi School Education Rules were taken against her. The management opposed the appeal on the ground that she was only an ad hoc teacher. The school management (the present writ petitioners) alleged that respondent no. 3 was appointed as a helper teacher purely on temporary and ad hoc basis on a consolidated salary and that she was removed because she failed to show exemplary co