MANJU GOEL, J.

( 1 ) THE IA No. 385/2005 is filed by the judgment debtor claiming several reliefs. However, at the time of arguments the only prayer pressed is dismissal of the execution petition.

( 2 ) THE basic facts relevant for the disposal of the application are as follows. The decree holder obtained a decree on 16. 10. 2003 from the High Court of the republic of Singapore in Suit No. 997/2002/v titled Oakwell Engineering Limited Vs. Energy power Systems Limited (now known as ener North Industries Inc. judgment debtor ). The decretal amount, in terms of Indian rupees, is Rs. 27,85,84,825/- (Rs. Twenty seven crores eighty five lacs eighty four thousand eight hundred twenty five only ). In the execution petition he seeks execution of the decree of Singapore Court under section 44a of the Civil Procedure Code. It is alleged by the decree holder that no amount has been received towards the satisfaction of the decree under execution. The appeal filed against the decree under execution has been dismissed by the Court of Appeal of the republic of Singapore. The decree is sought to be executed by issuance of warrants of attachment against the movable and immovable properties of the