SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1603

MUKUL MUDGAL, S.MURLIDHER RAO
D. T. C. – Appellant
Versus
ANUP SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ata-ul-Haque, PRATIBHA CHAUDHARY


S. MURALIDHAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against an order dated 10. 2. 2004 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the appellant's Writ Petition (C) No. 65 of 2002 thereby upholding an order dated 27. 4. 2001 passed by the Industrial Tribunal in o. P. No 204/1993.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of the present appeal are that the respondent was appointed with the appellant Corporation in February 1981 as a conductor. While he was on duty on 29. 10. 1992 on the bus No. DBP-6458 from Delhi to Ganga Nagar, an Assistant Ticket Inspector (ATI) along with other members of the ticket checking staff boarded the said bus at Sher Pur (Sirsa) and found that four persons were travelling in the bus without tickets. It is the appellant's case that those passengers disclosed that they boarded the bus at fatehabad for going to Sirsa and had paid Rs. 36/- as fare charges to the respondent who had not issued them tickets. On the basis of the report of the checking staff, the Depot Manager issued a chargesheet on 20. 11. 1992 to the respondent charging him with misconduct within the meaning of paras 19 (b) and (m) of the Standing Orders governing the conduct of the DTC employees
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top