SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1830

ANIL KUMAR
ANZ GRINDLAYS BANK – Appellant
Versus
U. O. I. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Morya


ANIL KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has prayed for issuance of Writ quashing of notice dated 8th June, 1994 issued by the Estate Officer under section 7 (3) of the Public premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 for payment of arrears of rent in respect of premises situated at Ashoka Hotel, 50 B Chanakyapuri, New delhi-110021.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a banking company incorporated in UK and having its registered office in India at H-2, Cannaught Circus, New Delhi. The petitioner company was into the business of issuing Visa cards for buying the goods and services on credit by entering into agreement, which governs the relationship between the petitioner and the establishment for the repayment of the money in lieu of visa card. According to the petitioner every Visa card has a floor limit and the user of the card in excess of floor limit requires authorization from the petitioner. It is contended by the petitioner that if no specific authorization of the transaction is obtained in case the card is used in excess of the floor limit then the petitioner is not liable to reimburse the shops/establishments which accepts the said visa card in terms of the agreement.

( 3



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top