ANIL KUMAR
SAI SEWA DAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
ANIL KUMAR, J.
( 1 ) RULE. The learned counsel for the parties state that no other affidavits are to be filed and the matter be taken up for final disposal.
( 2 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer to appointment of Mr. Justice K. Ramamoorthy (Retd.), who is appointed by respondent no. 6 as observer for the election of management committee of respondent No. 6 to be held on 6. 10. 2006, to be appointed as a Court observer/administrator giving him all necessary and incidental powers to ensure free and fair elections of respondent No. 6 and till then management of Sai Temple at Lodhi Road, Delhi be also done by him.
( 3 ) BRIEF facts to comprehend the disputes are that the petitioner is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act and is engaged in doing various religious, charitable, social and secular activities and to provide all kind of related facilities to the devotees of all religious institutions, temples, gurudwaras, churches etc.
( 4 ) THE grievance of the petitioner is that while providing volunteers and charitable services in Sai temple located at Lodhi Road which is one of Delhi's oldest temple of Sai Baba and is also known as "ch
Andi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandas Swami Suvarna Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust v. V.R. Rudani
ABL International Ltd. v. Export Credit Guarantee Corpn. of India Ltd.
Federal Bank Ltd. v. Sagar Thomas
Relied on : G.Bassi Reddy Vs. International Corporation Research Institute
Referred to : Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti Vs. Bhupinder Kaur And Others
Relied on : K. Venkatachala Bhat and Another Vs. Krishana Nayar
Referred to : Commissioner of Endowments and Others Vs. Vittal Rao and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.