SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1985

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
VIRENDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
LAXMI NARAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.K.Sharma, Mohinder Saini, Prashant Khatana, Vikas Chadha

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 17-12-2004, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the Judgment dated 21-8-2004, passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, was dismissed. By the judgment dated 21-8-2004 and order dated 9-9-2004, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi, had convicted the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and directed him to be released on probation for a period of one year on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount and to pay a compensation of Rs. 1,20,000/ -.

( 2 ) THE facts as indicated in the impugned order are that the complainant gave a sum of Rs. 80,000/-to the petitioner and his father, who were arrayed as accused No. 1 and 2 respectively. The said sum of Rs. 80,000/- was allegedly paid by the complainant (respondent No. 11 to the accused for the purposes of securing a job for the complainant's nephew in Haryana Police. In essence, this money was paid by way of illegal gratification for the purposes of arranging the said job through purported high profile politic




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top