BADAR DURREZ AHMED
VIRENDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
LAXMI NARAIN – Respondent
( 2 ) THE facts as indicated in the impugned order are that the complainant gave a sum of Rs. 80,000/-to the petitioner and his father, who were arrayed as accused No. 1 and 2 respectively. The said sum of Rs. 80,000/- was allegedly paid by the complainant (respondent No. 11 to the accused for the purposes of securing a job for the complainant's nephew in Haryana Police. In essence, this money was paid by way of illegal gratification for the purposes of arranging the said job through purported high profile politic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.