SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 158

A.K.SIKRI
NARENDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAJINDER KUMAR LAMBA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.R.Mahajan, I.C.Kumar, J.C.Mahindra, Purnima Maheshwari, S.N.KUMAR


A. K. SIKRI, J.


( 1 ) 1. The respondent No. 1 Rajinder Kumar Lamba (hereinafter referred to as 'the complainant') has filed complaint against the petitioner as well as against the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein. This complaint is under Sections 420/406/506 Part-II/448/480 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal code, 1860 (for short, 'ipc' ). It is alleged in this complaint by the complainant that he is a property dealer and deals in the business of sale and purchase of properties from his residence in Paschim Vihar, Delh. On 27. 9. 1995, Narender Singh (petitioner herein) and his sister Devinder Kaur (accused No. 2 in the complaint) approached the complainant and offered the property No. 72, Ring Road, Lajpat Nagar-III consisting of two and a half story building over an area of 792 sq. yds. for sale. They represented that this property was in the name of their father Sahib Singh, who died in september 1991, leaving behind Will dated 20. 4. 1970 in respect of this property and as per the said Will, the petitioner and Devinder Kaur (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused Nos. 1 and 2') had inherited 2/7th and l/7th share respectively. The petitioner agreed to sell his 2/7th und


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top