SWATANTER KUMAR, H.R.MALHOTRA
MADAN LAL ARORA – Appellant
Versus
SHIV KUMAR – Respondent
SWATANTER KUMAR, J.
( 1 ) IN furtherance to our order dated 9th February, 2007, learned counsel appearing for the appellant had placed on record the requisite documents including pleadings of the suit.
( 2 ) WE have heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant at some length. The plaintiff/appellant filed a suit for declaration, possession and in the alternative suit for redemption with possession and other reliefs being Suit no. 3/2006. He claimed these reliefs on the basis of the fact that he had purchased a shop measuring 8' X 30' forming part of property bearing No. X/140 (New) and Old No. 274/1, out of Khasra No. 72 situated in the abadi of Tagore gali, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi, for the consideration of Rs. 95,000/- from one Shri amarnath Nagpal S/o Shri Ram Narain Nagpal, who had executed General Power of attorney, Agreement to Sell, Affidavit, Receipt, Possession Letter and Deed of will all dated 26th March, 1999 in favour of the plaintiff. He claimed absolute right and title in the said property/shop. The plaintiff claimed that apart from the said property, he also purchased a flat on the first floor and another flat on the 2nd floor forming part of property bearing No. 6
Referred to : Bharat and others v. Ram Pratap and others
State of Gujarat and Others Vs. Meghji Pethraj Shah Charitable Trust and Others
Deva Ram and Another Vs. Ishwar Chand and Others
Marwari Kumhar and Others Vs. Bhagwanpuri Guru Ganeshpuri and Another
Dalip Singh Vs. Mehar Singh Rathee and Others
Kunjan Nair Sivaraman Nair Vs. Narayanan Nair and Others
State of Maharashtra and Another Vs. National Construction Company, Bombay and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.