SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 644

SWATANTER KUMAR, H.R.MALHOTRA
MADAN LAL ARORA – Appellant
Versus
SHIV KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.U.BARQI


SWATANTER KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) IN furtherance to our order dated 9th February, 2007, learned counsel appearing for the appellant had placed on record the requisite documents including pleadings of the suit.

( 2 ) WE have heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant at some length. The plaintiff/appellant filed a suit for declaration, possession and in the alternative suit for redemption with possession and other reliefs being Suit no. 3/2006. He claimed these reliefs on the basis of the fact that he had purchased a shop measuring 8' X 30' forming part of property bearing No. X/140 (New) and Old No. 274/1, out of Khasra No. 72 situated in the abadi of Tagore gali, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi, for the consideration of Rs. 95,000/- from one Shri amarnath Nagpal S/o Shri Ram Narain Nagpal, who had executed General Power of attorney, Agreement to Sell, Affidavit, Receipt, Possession Letter and Deed of will all dated 26th March, 1999 in favour of the plaintiff. He claimed absolute right and title in the said property/shop. The plaintiff claimed that apart from the said property, he also purchased a flat on the first floor and another flat on the 2nd floor forming part of property bearing No. 6






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top