J.M.MALIK
SHIVRAJ KRISHAN GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
CHANDER KRISHAN GUPTA – Respondent
J. M. MALIK, J.
( 1 ) SMT. Bimla Devi, defendant died on 12. 12. 2006,she left behind him sh. Shivraj Kishan Gupta, Smt. Neena Jain and Smt. Neera Goel as her legal representatives. Counsel for the plaintiff therein filed an application under Order 22 rule 4 CPC for bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased defendant. The above said legal representatives contested the above said application. According to them, Smt. Bimla Devi, on 26. 05. 2004, created a trust wherein her entire estate. e. , movable as well as immovable assets including all debts and claims due to her was to be held in a trust for the benefit of her two grand sons namely Nitin Gupta and namit Gupta both sons of Sh. Shiv Krishan Gupta to whom she had bequeathed her entire share. The Trust Deed further mentioned that it would be called "nitin and Namit Benefit Trust". Consequently, the said trust represents the estate of deceased Smt. Bimla Devi and her legal representatives. It was prayed that said trust be impleaded as legal representative of Smt. Bimla Dev.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff herein hotly contested the above said objections. It is alleged that the Will and the Codicil are forged documents and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.