SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 859

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
ARCHANA KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.D.KINRA, V.K.Malik


BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is aggrieved by the order on charge dated 08. 07. 2005 and the charge itself framed on 12. 07. 2005.

( 2 ) THE charge framed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate on 12. 07. 2005 in respect of the petitioner and co-accused Pankaj Sikka reads as under:

"that both of you in furtherance of your common intention on or about April 1997, you Archna being Clerk and you accused Pankaj Sikka being in charge of office of M/s Una Himancha finance and Investment Company Ltd and in such capacity entrusted with the property namely the cheque book of CC account no. 5525 maintained by the complainant with Canara Bank, Uttam Nagar in furtherance of your common intention committed criminal breach of trust with respect to the cheque bearing no. 492337 dated 7. 4. 1997 amounting to Rs. 45,000/-and that you have thereby committed an offence punishable u/s 408/34 IPC within the cognizance of this court. And I hereby direct that both of you be tried for the said offence by this court. "

( 3 ) THE facts necessary for disposal of this petition are that an FIR no. 550/97 was registered with Police Station Vikas Puri. The said FIR was registered on the basis of a




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top