MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, SANJIV KHANNA
TEJPAL SINGH BHATIA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
( 1 ) THE present appeals by Mr. Tejpal Singh Bhatia, Mrs. Harinder Kaur bhatia and Malsh Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. is directed against the Order dated 12th september, 2005 dismissing the application filed by the appellants under Order xxxix, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the Code, for short) along with an application under Order XXXIX, Rule 2a of the Code.
( 2 ) THE appellants herein have filed the Suit seeking permanent injunction restraining the respondent-DDA, Union of India and the Lt. Governor, Delhi their agents and servants from interfering with peaceful possession of agricultural land measuring in total 19 bighas and 19 biswas situated in revenue estate of mehrauli, New Delhi. The details of the land has been mentioned in the plaint.
( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the appellants had submitted that the respondents are wrongly claiming that the land, subject matter of the Suit stands acquired by the Government of India, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and vests with the respondent-Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as DDA, for short ).
( 4 ) IN this regard, learned counsel for t
Sarguja Transport Services versus State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Gwalior and others
Reference was also made to State of Rajasthan versus D.R. Laxmi
State of Haryana versus Dewan Singh
Municipal Council, Ahmednagar versus Shah Hyder Beig
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay versus Industrial Development Investment Company Pvt.Ltd.
Dhurandhar Prasad Singh versus Jai Prakash University
Direct Recruit Class II Engineering Officers Association versus State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.