SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1179

SANJIV KHANNA
RAMESH CHAND – Appellant
Versus
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AVNISH AHLAWAT, D.N.VOHRA, LATIKA CHAUDHARY


MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred by the appellant being dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 29th August, 2006 passed by the learned single judge as also the award passed by the Labour Court, Delh.

( 2 ) THE appellant herein was working as a conductor in the Delhi Transport corporation. While he was working as such he was served with a charge sheet dated 15. 5. 1991 on the allegation that the appellant was not issuing tickets to the passengers and also misbehaving with the checking staff. Departmental enquiry was held and on completion thereof the petitioner was dismissed from service. Being aggrieved of the aforesaid order of 'removal from service' the appellant raised a dispute which was referred for adjudication to the Labour court by the appropriate Government on the following terms:-

"whether removal from service of Shri Ramesh Chand is illegal and/or unjustified and, if so, to what extent is he entitled to and what directions are necessary in this respect".

( 3 ) THE learned Labour Court received the evidence adduced by the parties and thereafter passed an award holding that neither the removal of the workman from service is illegal no








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top