SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1218

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, SANJIV KHANNA
RAGHUKUL TILAK – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GAURAV SHARMA, MANINDER SINGH, PRATIBHA M.SINGH, R.C.Malhotra


SANJIV KHANNA, J.

( 1 ) LEARNED Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant by the impugned judgment dated 29th September, 2006 has aptly pointed out the paradox faced by the Court while deciding the matter by describing the appellant as 'eklavya' of Mahabharat, who was equal in skill and prowess if not even better than legendary 'arjuna'. On "merits" of the appellant there cannot be any doubt but the question raised is that of eligibility and whether the appellant meets the minimum eligibility criteria fixed for admission to MBBS course.

( 2 ) THE appellant had appeared in common All-India Pre-Medical/dental entrance Examination held in the year 2006 and secured ranking of 1600 in the merit list of 2400 selected candidates under the 15% quota. The appellant would have been entitled to admission in a medical college on the basis of ranking secured. The appellant, who was otherwise eligible on merit for admission to a medical college, has been denied admission on account of eligibility criteria prescribed by the Medical Council of India. The said eligibility criteria was also specified in the bulletin issued by Central Board of Secondary Education in 200










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top