MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, SANJIV KHANNA
RAGHUKUL TILAK – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
( 1 ) LEARNED Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant by the impugned judgment dated 29th September, 2006 has aptly pointed out the paradox faced by the Court while deciding the matter by describing the appellant as 'eklavya' of Mahabharat, who was equal in skill and prowess if not even better than legendary 'arjuna'. On "merits" of the appellant there cannot be any doubt but the question raised is that of eligibility and whether the appellant meets the minimum eligibility criteria fixed for admission to MBBS course.
( 2 ) THE appellant had appeared in common All-India Pre-Medical/dental entrance Examination held in the year 2006 and secured ranking of 1600 in the merit list of 2400 selected candidates under the 15% quota. The appellant would have been entitled to admission in a medical college on the basis of ranking secured. The appellant, who was otherwise eligible on merit for admission to a medical college, has been denied admission on account of eligibility criteria prescribed by the Medical Council of India. The said eligibility criteria was also specified in the bulletin issued by Central Board of Secondary Education in 200
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.