SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1415

G. P. MATHUR, ASHOK BHAN
Sanjeev Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Bhan, J.—Delay condoned. Leave granted in SLP (C) 23582-23584 of 2004 (CC No. 2256-2258).

Interlocutory application in WP (C) No. 604 of 2002 is allowed.

2. As the points of law involved in all these cases are the same or similar with little variations which would be indicated in the later part of the judgment, this judgment shall dispose of all the above-mentioned cases by a common judgment.

3. Writ Petition (C) No. 604 of 2002, WP (C) No. 25 of 2003 and WP (C) No. 33 of 2003 pertain to the batch of students who joined the course in 1994 whereas the WP (C) No. 616 of 2002, WP (C) No. 634 of 2002, WP (C) No. 11 of 2003, WP (C) No. 14 of 2003, WP (C) No. 16 of 2003, WP (C) No. 26 of 2003, WP (C) No. 25 of 2003, WP (C) No. 27 of 2003, WP (C) No. 34 of 2003, WP (C) No. 404 of 2003, CA No. of 7363-7365 of 2004 (arising out of SLP (C) No. 23582-23584 of 2004/CC No. 2256-2258) and IA ..... of 2004 pertain to the students who joined the course in the year 1995; WP (C) No. 391 of 2003, WP (C) No. 488 of 2003 and WP (C) No. 190 of 2004 pertain to the students who joined the course in 1996; WP (C) No. 185 of 2004 and WP (C) No. 172 of 2004 pertain to the students who joined the course






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top