SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1297

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
GANNY KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GURBAKSH SINGH, O.P.Arya, R.P.Sharma


BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition raises the interesting question as to whether compensation granted by the State for the 1984 Riot victims should be given to persons in accordance with their entitlement to inherit property from the deceased persons as per the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 or that the State is not governed by the personal laws and is required to award compensation equitably to the next of kin "

( 2 ) THE petitioner (Smt Ganny Kaur) was married to Late Ladha Singh. They had a daughter (Ishwari Kaur) who was married to one Laxman Singh. Laxman Singh is the son of Kishan Singh (Respondent No. 3) herein. Ishwari Kaur and Laxman singh had two children, Sajan Singh and Laxm. In the unfortunate events which took place in 1984 and which go under the name 'the 1984 Riots', Ishwari Kaur, laxman Singh and their two children were burnt to death by the rioters. The entire family of four perished at the hands of the murdering marauders. At that point of time, Sajan Singh was four years old and Laxmi was two years old.

( 3 ) AFTER the 1984 Riots, the Government of NCT of Delhi (Respondent No. 1) sanctioned an ex gratia payment of Rs 10,000/- to the surviving family m


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top